Skip to content

What Do Conservatives Seek to Preserve?

March 24, 2013

Where was all this concern with budget deficits and the national debt when Ronald Reagan and the two Bushes were president? Am I the only one to see hypocrisy in a political party that sees nothing wrong with waging war at will with no thought of the cost while demanding budget cuts in domestic spending programs important to the well-being of deserving Americans to pay the costs of recovery from natural disasters?

The Republicans do not really care about deficit spending. If that were the case, they would not have approved of the tax cuts under Reagan at the same time as he was ramping up defense spending, which resulted in easily predictable increased deficits under his watch. The same would have been true of the George W. Bush tax cuts and wars of convenience. As long as the money is being spent to further goals they are pursing, be they military or economic, no questioning of where the money is going to come from to pay for it is made.

The main goal of the GOP in Congress seems to be to preserve the economic advantages gained by the wealthy and large corporations through the past thirty-plus years of tax code manipulation. The tax laws have resulted in the greatest degree of income and wealth inequality this nation has seen since before the Great Depression. The middle class and poor have seen real wages stagnate and even decline at a time when corporate profits are at record levels and incomes at the top have skyrocketed. Lowered marginal tax rates for high incomes, capital gains, interest and stock dividends have also contributed in an increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of the top 1% of the population. The wealthy are thriving at a time when it has become increasingly difficult for many of the rest of us to maintain our standard of living.

Tremendous increases in productivity have resulted in increased profits for corporations and huge salary increases for CEOs and other high-level corporate executives, but have not been shared anywhere near equitably with the workers. Many jobs have been lost to cheaper labor overseas and workers who are treated and paid at levels which would be deemed criminal and/or inhumane by American standards. Free Trade Agreements which make it easier for capital to move around the globe ignoring national boundaries, working conditions and environmental impacts contribute to this inequality on an international level as well. Tax codes that enable such manipulation don’t help anyone except those at the top.

Because needing to pay our bills is something easy for politicians to sell to people familiar with having to pay their own bills on a daily basis, some way to ease the deficit without increasing income/revenue has become the main theme of the Republicans in their quest to maintain the status quo. Some of the most costly programs, other than the sacrosanct defense department, are the social programs created during the New Deal and Great Society in order to ease the extremes of poverty for both the sick and elderly, including Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but also other programs like food stamps. The rapid rate of cost increases in health care in recent decades, along with the overall aging of the population has seen a trend for even greater increases in expenditures in these programs as time goes on.

While rising health care costs and an aging population are easily verifiable conditions in our economy, cutting benefits to recipients of these programs is not the only way to address future funding of them. Costs can be cut without forcing individuals to pay out of pocket money they do not have for medical treatment. Shifting more of the burden for medical care on the elderly by turning Medicare into a voucher system as proposed each year by Paul Ryan since he became chair of the House Budget Committee, is unfair because it obviously means that those who do not have money will be unable to get medical care. Period. Taking revenues off the table entirely is an unreasonable demand, especially if it is done so just to maintain income and wealth inequality that does nothing to add to our economic prosperity. Time has proven this extreme economic inequality does little to contribute to our welfare as a society or the health of our economy.

The industries which have remained highly profitable, even with the advent of the Affordable Care Act, at least so far, have been the health care providers, health care insurance and pharmaceutical companies. Each of these expended enormous sums of money lobbying during the crafting of the legislation to ensure that their interests would not be severely damaged by the final product. I have heard of no significant drop in their profits or any major bankruptcies in any of these sectors since its implementation began. Further cost savings in health programs can be made. Some have already started to change the future cost projections under the Affordable Care Act as it is in the process of implementation. Why not allow for bargaining of prices for prescription medicines, for example? Why do drug have to be more expensive in the US than Canada?

The point of these programs is precisely to shift resources to those who need them from those who have more than they need. Isn’t the goal to enable more people to be able to live long, healthy lives, rather than die of neglect and poverty? Do we wish to see our nation become one where we see living conditions deteriorate for some of our people, not because resources do not exist to help them, but because those who control those resources refuse to allow them to be helped?

Social Security is still at the forefront of those seeking to cut the social safety net, despite the fact that it neither caused the problem in the first place nor faces an insurmountable funding gap anytime in the foreseeable future. The whole Chained-CPI argument, even being espoused by the Obama Administration itself, would do little other than worsen living conditions for those already nearest or beneath the poverty level among our retirees. We are not talking about cutting the incomes of millionaires appreciably here, but people who already use food stamps, housing subsidies, heating assistance and other programs( which are also facing calls for cuts, by the way) just to make ends meet cannot afford further benefit cuts. Increasing the cap and broadening the scope of what is taxed by the Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes would be more than adequate to address the need of these programs without resorting to faulty calculations of cost-of-living adjustments. Social Security should be increased, if anything, to ensure that even fewer retirees are living in poverty.

The wealthy do not get that way in a vacuum, by pulling themselves up by their bootstraps as some seem to claim. Nobody “deserves” to be a billionaire, nor even needs to be by any stretch of the imagination. If allowing too few people to control a disproportionate amount of our resources means that more of us go hungry, homeless and without adequate medical treatment or education, we have our priorities screwed up and need to work on creating a more just system. Remember, we are told to support our troops, but many live on the streets after risking their lives for us. Are they less important to us than keeping millionaires eating food at expensive restaurants served to them by people making less than minimum wage and depending on their largesse in providing them enough in tips just to make ends meet?

The President put forth many progressive ideas in his State of the Union address back in February, including raising the minimum wage, reforming immigration law, creating jobs that people need to get our economy going strong again and decreasing the economic inequalities that exist. The Republican leadership in Congress seems intent on thwarting any progressive initiatives from getting off the ground. They seem to want to perpetuate the inequalities that exist in our economy, health care system, education and society at large and protect the perceived interests of their benefactors over the very real interests of their constituents. I only hope there are enough people left in Washington who will refuse to cave to their demands and hostage-taking and to lead the way to  the changes needed to improve life in the United States for all of us.

From → Uncategorized

  1. The GOP has no other function than to turn America into a post-apocalyptical nightmare where a few wealthy warlords control the desperate peasants who they’ve deceived, by religion and propaganda to believe the ruling class has their best interests at heart. In other words, a universe ruled by bigoted, evil monsters like Rush Limbaugh who spew venom with no other purpose but to perpetuate misery while duping the poor, huddled masses.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Nice job. Very simply, the GOP are paid mercenaries for the extremely wealthy. They often pretend to be concerned with their constituency, but have concern for nothing other than their own bank accounts and possessions. This is, sadly, sociopathic behavior that should be obvious to anyone with a functioning brain. However, the iron grip of control over our media – thanks to deregulation during the Reagan Inc. administration – has created a serious disconnect from what’s actually happening in the world. People are able to live in a bubble of apathetic complacency, a made up world constructed by predatory manipulators who use disingenuous propaganda to dumb down the masses and keep them in their place. Educating the masses is the only way out of this living nightmare.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. First, thanks for the Twitter follow, that’s how I got here. You cover a lot of ground here. This should be five or blog posts to do the subjects justice so let me just take one item. First, a disclaimer. I am totally over political parties. The Republicans are no more virtuous than Democrats and vice versa. It’s more like Yankees vs. Red Sox. It’s a game and as long as you buy a ticket that pay their salaries, the participants are happy.

    “The Republicans do not really care about deficit spending. If that were the case, they would not have approved of the tax cuts under Reagan”

    Politicians and their enablers, professional journalists, talk about tax cuts but there are tax rates and tax revenues. One doesn’t equal the other. Where the Republicans screw up is in their insistence that all tax rate cuts lead to higher revenues. Where Democrats screw up is in their insistence that all tax rate increases lead to higher revenues. Arthur Laffer was right, there is a curve. At zero tax rates, tax revenue is zero and at 100% tax revenue is zero. So what rate yields the optimum revenue? No one knows, the participants are too busy bloodying one another to think about anything that complicated.

    P.S. Fill out your about page, it looks ridiculous as is. 🙂


  4. Maybe we should stop trying to police the world (to get more oil?). Cut back the military and use it for our defense instead of getting involved in other country’s fights all over the world. I’m feeling a lot less secure here in the homeland.


    • nodrama permalink

      Little of the Defense budget is about making us safer. It is about making the oligarchs richer. The current POTUS and his Defense Secretary have tried to reduce the Defense budget but congress won’t let them because it lines their pockets and keeps their constituents in jobs or at least money.


  5. Reblogged this on Ozarks Blue.


  6. Reblogged this on wvjoe911 Blog of Reality and commented:
    Squash the GOP in 2014 for good. Save #America in 2014 #UniteBlue


  7. Bill Davis permalink

    Rick, Again you are spot on. Reagan started the downfall. Excellent post making the GOP scam show more transparent. I agree with a few others, I think the Democrats are almost just as bought as the Rethugs now, especially the leaders of committees and the like.

    I also want to point out that one of the biggest crimes right now is the continued foreclosure crisis where we have had 1.5 million families foreclosed on, at least some of fraudulently, since the 2007-2008 financial crisis, and yet our congress critters and White House seem to be fine with that, as they play around the edges, but allow the “rule of law” to be broken by the financial elites.

    Keep up the good work Rick, I will continue to follow you on twitter, and read your posts here. Good on ya!! kcbill13


  8. Excellent blogpost RIck – thanks for sharing, I’ve RT’d it out to my followers 🙂 I hope you don’t mind the cheeky plug here too – but some of those reading here may also like my own thoughts on US politics (mostly found at


  9. Jean permalink

    Shared on fb as well. Excellent blog.


  10. And if you were just becoming of working age 30 yrs ago when their manipulation began, you’ve been screwed by them nearly your entire adult life, and had your own kids’ lives mortgaged for their greed.


  11. Reblogged this on Myaimistrue7 and commented:


  12. You make some good points. Our country is in severe trouble. The government of the republican and democrat establishment (not the people) are in full control. Of the presidential frontrunners, one has a itchy trigger finger and the is a pathological liar. Neither are suitable. The federal government should have no business in education or healthcare. Both are failing because of it.


    • nodrama permalink

      Government involvement in Education as that involvement currently exists is a problem but funny I was educated in the public school system which was under government control and it was an incredible system. Even was able to get government funded student loans that allowed be to get an education and not owe some private bank my income for the rest of my life. But that’s the way the Republicans roll. And as far as Healthcare is concerned, the reason healthcare sucks is because of free market. The ACA actually reduced the number of uninsured people by almost 30 million and it also reduced the number of people who have to file for bankruptcy or can’t get insurance because of ridiculous rules set up by free market anti trust insurance and pharmaceutical companies. So any system can work as long as the people involved with making it work want it to work and are invested int doing the public good.


  13. I will immediately grasp your rss as I can not in finding your
    e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service.
    Do you’ve any? Kindly let me know in order that I could subscribe.



  14. I’ve been surfing online greater than three hours these days, but I
    by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours.

    It is lovely value sufficient for me. In my view, if
    all webmasters and bloggers made just right content material as you probably did, the web might
    be a lot more helpful than ever before.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Jude permalink

    A good read. Somewhere, at some time, we must stop tasting the phrase American Exceptionalism. We behave like a corrupt, rogue nation.


  16. iamelisabethparker permalink

    Well said.


  17. Jody Dupont permalink

    Until we get the thieves and traitors out,I don’t hold out much hope for any of us.Especially for our kids and grandkids.Everyone needs to get out and vote in 2018.Vote for the people that have always represented the middle class,poor,old,sick,kids and disabled,THE DEMOCRATS.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. I think they want to rollback economic and social gains by minorities, LGBTQ and other groups. There is a selfishness at play based on fear. This might be a overly simplistic view but I see it happening more and more. They also find the future is not long for them and they are going to hold on to what they can for as long as they can.

    Liked by 1 person

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. What Do Conservatives Seek to Preserve? – thesimpleminddotco

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: