Skip to content


June 23, 2013

Nearly everyday, commercials air on TV and radio touting the great low prices available to consumers shopping at Walmart. Other ads discuss how the company prides itself on the upward mobility of its employees within the corporate structure from hourly associates up through the ranks to store management positions. Deeper analysis of Walmart’s policies and practices with regard to its employees show it to be far from the paragon of employer virtue that the advertisements would leave one to believe.

Walmart provides many of its store employees with a compensation package that leaves many of them dependent upon government assistance to feed, house and provide medical care for themselves and their families. In a very real sense, American taxpayers,through such programs as Food Stamps, Medicaid, school lunch programs,  federal housing assistance and other programs are subsidizing Walmart. Taxpayer money enables them to maintain their low prices while keeping their labor costs lower than they need to be in order for all their workers to earn a living wage. Below are links to articles citing studies reflecting the extent to which Walmart, the largest private-sector employer in the nation, takes advantage of our social safety net and low minimum wage to keep its profits high.

Another way in which Walmart exploits workers is the way by which it obtains many of the low-priced items it sells to U.S. consumers. By contracting out production of items such as clothing to manufacturers located in countries where wages and working conditions exist that would be illegal in this country, the company is able to obtain quality clothing and other goods while seemingly divorcing itself from the conditions under which they are made. Poorly informed consumers have no idea of the way the people who make the clothes they buy from China, or some other low-wage country are treated by their employers, or the dangerous working conditions they must endure to make their living. I’m sure many would find the price of such goods to be too high if it included the value of the lives lost in their production.

Walmart does not directly employ these workers in foreign factories. Earlier this year, the plight of some of them became highly publicized due to the occurrence of a number of factory disasters in Bangladesh resulting in the deaths of hundreds of sweatshop workers in factories which contract out to Walmart and other major Western retailers. While Walmart and other retailers dependent upon such labor are not currently held legally liable for such deaths, it is morally reprehensible for them to rely so heavily on inhumane treatment of workers by contractors to profit so highly from uninformed consumers here. We must not allow them to escape responsibility for the conditions under which their goods are produced or the treatment of the workers who make them. Most retailers recently agreed to increased oversight to mitigate such occurrences in the future, but Walmart and the Gap were conspicuous in their refusal to join in this joint effort.

Our government has a role to play in all of this. While the sequester and budget cuts designed to reduce the debt and deficit have often attempted to cut social safety net programs helping out workers like those cited above at Walmart, Congress refuses to do anything to alleviate the problem of low wages. The President, back in February, asked for an admittedly inadequate raise in the minimum wage to $9 per hour. Instead, the House of Representatives last week narrowly defeated a proposed farm bill that would have cut the food stamp program by $20 billion over 10 years. Many in Congress still seek to further cut taxes on the wealthy and corporations while lowering the deficit by cutting the programs that really help the people who desperately need them.

While the world needs more protections for workers, particularly those in low-wage countries that are currently facing the harshest working conditions, governments are working in relative secrecy to lessen restrictions on multinational corporations in their conduct of business on an international level. These “free trade” pacts do little to help out workers in any of the countries involved, while reducing greatly the ability of national and local governments to regulate the large companies as they conduct themselves within their borders. In essence, the governments come to exist more as protectors of the corporations than of their own citizens and taxpayers.

Walmart, Apple and other corporate giants are not alone in their blatant disregard for the welfare of their employees and those who actually manufacture the goods and services that they sell. They are merely some of the most egregious violators of decent moral standards of conduct with regard to how they treat their workers. Sky-high profits accentuate this fact. Those profits have not resulted in better wages and working conditions for the average worker in decades. Some companies do a far better better job of compensating their employees and still maintain a profit. One that comes to mind is Costco. Information about unfair and inhumane working conditions and how we taxpayers and our government subsidize them needs to be made more public so that consumers can make  educated decisions about where to shop and what to buy based on corporate responsibility and conduct. Consumer boycotts can do wonders in changing corporate behavior for the better.

Putting pressure on our elected officials do do something to rectify the insanity of the policies our government has put in place to not only allow but encourage such abuse of employees by employers is also needed. Our displeasure at the situation needs to be heard loud and clear, both inside and outside of the voting booth. Luckily, for now, the farm bill went down to defeat. But so did a bill to raise the minimum wage so that it would more nearly approximate becoming a livable one. For the time being, many Walmart workers will still be able to use government assistance to buy the food they sell in store which employs them. This needs to remain true as long as our government insists on letting employers underpay their workers. Walmart and most others obviously will continue to do so until forced to do otherwise. People before profit should be the goal, but it is one our society falls far short of at this time.

Suggested Further Readings:

Low Wages at a Single Walmart Store Cost Taxpayers about $1 Million Every Year, Says New Committee Staff Report

The Low-Wage Drag on Our Economy: Walmart’s low wages and their effect on taxpayers and economic growth

Unlevel Playing Field: How Taxpayers Foot Walmart’s Bills

That Cheap Stuff You Just Bought At Walmart? Turns Out It Costs $6,000 More Than You Thought


From → Uncategorized

  1. Margaret Bridwell Savalas permalink

    Excellent article! An Arkansas native, I was appalled as I saw WalMart change after Mr. Sam’s death. I avoid them 99.9% of the time, and will shop at 3 stores to find what I need at lower prices. If they would pay their employees just $1 more an hour, all other retailers would follow. They could be a real leader in changing our economic climate!


  2. Ann Snyder permalink

    It’s time to push for a law that fines employers for the exact amount taxpayers provide in public assistance as a result of low wages and inadequate benefits. It’s time to end welfare for the wealthy.


  3. Reblogged this on .


  4. Larry St Croix permalink

    $9 per hour is not a living wage in most states, assuming a full 40 hour work week for 52 weeks of the year annual earnings are $18,720

    Temporary and part-time workers do not come under current ‘Obamacare’ regulations

    What Walmart, Dollar General and others of their ilk are currently doing is to quietly reduce most employees to a maximum of 19 hours per week. e.g. My local Dollar General now has ONE full time employee, the manager, and 8 part-time, down from 4 full time plus 4 or 5 part timers.

    Walmart is using temporary workers on 180-day on-call (no regular scheduled work hours) contracts year round to fill staffing gaps, temporary workers as a percentage of Walmart’s total US workforce have jumped to10% this year from only 1% to 2% in 2012


  5. Rogue Quaker permalink

    Excellent article. I’m tired of footing Walmart’s social welfare bill. It’s time they gave back to the people and communities that have made them the world’s largest retailer.


  6. William Harasym permalink

    Reblogged this on Oxygen in Use! Smoking is OK!.


  7. Where I live, a wage of $9 an hour would allow a person to eat well, but be homeless. Welcome to the United States of Corporations.


  8. Great article and should be mandatory reading!


  9. cARTHAN permalink

    I disagree, I think people are aware of the practices of Wally world, they just don’t care or can’t afford to care. I haven’t shopped in Wally world for years, I use a small credit union and my cell is none of the big monopoly carriers. People shop at Wally world, use BofA, Chase, Wells Fargo, ATT, Sprint and Verizon because of name recognition and convenience. I’ve spoken to many people and converted some away from the dark side. Look at it this way, if someone is making minimum wage and need to buy groceries the most convenient cheapest store is where they will shop. Under paid citizens in another country is less than a low priority. Further, BofA is convenient and everyone knows the ATT. name. Shopping around is time consuming. I’m not making excuses, these are the reasons people have given me for years and until that mind set is changed,…and so on and so on and so.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: