Skip to content

David Swanson: We Need a New Armistice Day + Transcript

Another eloquent post by David Swanson via Dandelion Salad blog. Before it was renamed Veterans Day, the holiday was called Armistice Day, in honor of the date of November 11, 1918 and the signing of the treaty that ended World War I. The War to End All Wars obviously did not achieve that lofty goal. We need to work together to end the use of violence and murderous force as a means of resolving conflicts. We need to stop glorifying war, those who fight and die in war, but especially those who profit enormously through the conduct of war with little or no risk to themselves.

Early on in his Presidency, Donald Trump sought to hold a very expensive and gawdy display of US military might in the form of a huge military parade. That is the last thing we need at this point in our history. We need reason to create a new holiday, one dedicated to celebrating an end to war and the dawn of a more peaceful and enlightened society – a true Armistice Day to replace a holiday that reminds us of how futile war has become as a means of resolving human conflict. The wars we have conducted recently and those we are continuing to fight today never seem to end and the only “victors” seem to be those profiting from the death and destruction while not physically endangering themselves at all. End them before they end us. – RJC


via David Swanson: We Need a New Armistice Day + Transcript


17 Years of Getting Afghanistan Completely Wrong by David Swanson

In-depth analysis of the never-ending quagmire that is the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan by the USA. Diplomacy by failed military adventurism in all its glory – or is that infamy? Three US Presidents and still no end in sight. Only winners I see so far are the merchants of death/AKA arms manufactures. – RJC

via 17 Years of Getting Afghanistan Completely Wrong by David Swanson

Land of the free? How Trump has put America’s identity in peril

Great analysis of the Trump Administration’s performance to date and warning of the perils we may face in the future with him at the helm. – rjc

RadioActive1 WBOB - We're Back On The Block

As the midterm elections approach, Ben Fountain argues white voters should know that a real democracy can only survive if there is true equality for everyone

By Ben Fountain | The Guardian | September 23, 2018

Some 20 months into his term Trump has been pretty much the president we expected: loud, boastful, bullying, reckless, ruder than the worst-bred minor royalty, tetchy as a wolverine in heat. The main thing to note is the very most main thing: he’s still going.

The juggernaut that was launched off the down escalator at Trump Tower back in 2015 rolls on, strewing bodies and busted parts in its wake and one hell of a nasty stink, yet roll it does with undiminished vigor.

Is there anything left to say that would stop it? Think of the hundreds of millions of words that have been thrown at him the last three years, every kind…

View original post 1,910 more words

In the Public Interest: Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?

Some excellent questions raised by Ralph Nader for which the American public deserves answers, but which those responsible for answering them seem to either be asleep at the wheel in the performance of their jobs or just flat out refusing to do so. Far more government accountability is necessary for us to regain a functional democracy rather than continuing to slip into authoritarian plutocracy. – rjc

Source: In the Public Interest: Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?

The Importance of Labor and Labor Day

Excellent commentary and history of labor in the United States. Labor Day has had its ups and downs in this country, as have labor laws and the rights of workers. Our current Administration gives lip service to valuing workers, while eroding labor rights at seemingly every turn. We need to strengthen labor protections both in this country and worldwide to lessen the ability of the oligarchs to exploit the workers who produce the goods and services that make so few of them even more enormously wealthy while pitting us against each other to work harder while lowering our standard of living slowly but surely.

The path that Trump and the GOP are taking us down will only succeed in making most of us poorer in the long run and distract our attention from their exploitation of our labor to augment their bank accounts through use of their undeserved privilege, which they see as either their birthright or the fruits of their superior merit as human beings or some combination thereof. Immigrants and people of different religions, races, ethnicity or sexual or gender preference are not the enemy. The hunger for power over others and greed for material possessions in excess of real need for them cause the problems that then become scapegoated into irrelevant differences  used as excuses for much of the warfare and social turmoil that result in the situation like that we face now.

Hopefully, we will someday see a society where all work to improve the welfare of all in a more cooperative endeavor, so that all will have enough to not only survive, but to thrive, unhindered by greed-driven wars and grand theft. The way to achieve this is to stop electing folks like our current President and his powerful enablers elsewhere in government and society at large and choose a path that progresses to more equality and peace rather than regression to times when life was even worse for most people than it is now. Turning the clock back on labor and worker rights, like dismantling the social safety nets that took so long to develop, as has been broadly supported by some very prominent leaders in this country and abroad recently, is something we must oppose with every fiber of our beings. – RJC

Padre Steve's World: Resist the Beginning, Consider the End

Friends of Padre Steve’s World,

Today is Labor Day and sadly many people don’t really understand its significance. For decades organized labor has been demonized by the descendants of people who died to secure decent working conditions, wages, and benefits for regular hard working people. The attacks on labor and workers have become much more pronounced under the Trump Administration than any prior administration since that of Herbert Hoover.

But most of the people lucky enough not to have to work on Labor Day really don’t know why it it matters, and whips in spite of those who despise labor and care not a whit about working people, who simply to use business terminology are simply human capital or resources. I actually despise those terms because they dehumanize people by turning them into impersonal economic units of measure.

So today I am digging into the vault to explore why Labor…

View original post 2,054 more words


We Now Live Under The Rule Of A Rentier Capitalism by Paul Street

An excellent essay by Paul Street explaining many of the trends in advanced capitalist societies in the last several decades which have resulted in vastly increased economic inequality within them as compared to the early decades of the Post WWII era. Wealth, income and political influence have become increasingly concentrated in fewer hands, exacerbated by laws and policies which enable such trends. Intellectual property laws, tax laws favoring certain forms of income over others, and ownership of property (physical as well as intellectual) along with how the wealth becomes re-distributed over time, result in more really rich folks and many, many more living in poverty.

Some examples of how this works are easily gleaned when one examines our current health care system and the pharmaceutical industry serve to impoverish so many. Health insurance provided by employers or on an individual basis has gradually (Depending on how one one defines that term) become more costly for employees at the same time as their paychecks have failed to keep up with the cost of living in other areas of their lives. The increasing number of new jobs replacing old jobs but at lower pay and benefits hurts millions. Allowing pharmaceutical companies to prey on captive audiences of people requiring their products to become healthy or just to stay alive (through the use of patent and other laws that enable them to often make windfall profits on their products, regardless of the effect those prices have on those who pay them) ,eams that more people than ever before are just one hospital stay away from lifetime debt and/or bankruptcy.

To date, most countries have done a better job of alleviating the effects of these changes as regards health care than the US has, but the overall extremity of the problem hits other areas of our lives as well. Climate change becomes an even more urgent problem, especially when governments like our current one continue to urge increased consumption of the various energy and other industrial and agricultural methods that speed up the climate change to begin with. To put it simply, we allow a small number of oligarchs to profit tremendously at the expense of the vast mass of humanity with little or no regard for the future.

The solutions to these problems exist, though they have been and will continue to be fiercely opposed by most of the people who have gained control of most of the world’s wealth. The time to slow down, stop and begin to reverse this path of personal and societal destruction is long overdue. Our government and economic system need to become friendlier to us by becoming saner in the ways in which we are all treated by the system, and the ways in which we treat our planet. H/T to Dandelion Salad blog. – RJC

via We Now Live Under The Rule Of A Rentier Capitalism by Paul Street

Refugees- A Moral Obligation and a Call to Action

Another excellent missive from Envisioning the American Dream by Sally Edelstein concerning our responsibilities with regard to refugees and the utter hypocrisy of Donald Trump and key advisers (most notably Stephen Miller on this issue) in formulating a policy regarding how we as a nation treat people seeking refuge from a homeland which has torn their world asunder. Bereft of any humanitarian moral courage, the policy to this point has resulted in large scale separation of family members from each other with no thought of reuniting them, as well as denying valid applications for asylum and deportation back to their countries of origin despite the very real dangers posed to the lives of people thus turned away from our borders. The total lack of humanity and any semblance of compassion in dealing with this tragic situation illustrates how far from American values our government has come when led by a President and key adviser who have benefited mightily from more benevolent immigration policies from years gone by.

The USA has not always been charitable when dealing with those who seek to come live within our borders, but this current attitude of xenophobia, racism and fear mongering is neither warranted nor a valid reflection of how a majority of the American people would seek to treat people living in such dire straits. Not only does this policy need to be called out for the morally bankrupt fiasco it has turned into, but Congress needs to stop sitting on its collective hands and pass legislation spelling out a better way to deal with immigration which not only deals with enabling people being persecuted and mistreated in their homelands (for whatever illegitimate reasons) to escape the dire circumstances that drove them to seek asylum here, but also to be treated with the compassion and dignity that should be afforded all people as an integralpart of their basic rights as human beings. – RJC


Envisioning The American Dream

Vintage United Jewish Appeal Ad 1947 image of little girl “Stretch out your hand in brotherhood, open your heart in compassion.”

Just like my own Jewish family, White House senior advisor Steven Miller’s family was the beneficiary of immigration policies  that his own administration is working so hard to undo.

Trump may be unhinged but Steven Miller is clearly unmoored, especially when it comes to his own family roots.

Like many Jewish Americans, Steven Miller is from a family of immigrants and refugees who desperately came to this country escaping anti Jewish pograms.

But unlike most Jewish Americans who feel a deep sense of obligation to help the next generation of  refugees, Steven Miller is Trump’s architect of his draconian immigration  policy.

Miller is a disgrace to America and a disgrace to the Jews.

Even Miller’s uncle has recently written a scathing editorial eviscerating his black sheep nephew calling him a “immigration hypocrite.”

Jews and Jewish organizations have longed stepped…

View original post 1,253 more words

The case for obstruction

Excellent opus by Judd Legum for his newsletter Popular Information  outlining a possible future course for the ongoing investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller involving President Trump, the 2016 campaign and actions taken subsequent to his inauguration. Time will tell how the situation is finally resolved, but recent activity by the President and his legal team indicate increased anxiety in anticipation of what comes next. – RJC

Welcome to Popular Information, a political newsletter for people who give a damn — written by me, Judd Legum. Send your feedback to or tweet your thoughts using #popularinfo. Reminder: Popular Information is published Monday through Thursday. I’ll return to your inbox, bright and early, on Monday, August 6.

Source: The case for obstruction

SCOTUS vs. the American People

On February 13, 2016, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died, ending his nearly thirty year tenure on the nation’s highest court. At that time, the GOP leadership of the Senate (Republicans held a majority in that body for the first time under President Obama after the 2014 midterm elections) declared they would not act on any nomination to fill that seat until the new President was inaugurated in January of 2017. President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to fill the slot became an exercise in futility as the Senate Judiciary Committee refused to hold hearings or vote on his nomination, nor did the entire Senate.

The story of Donald Trump’s ascension to the Presidency after his surprise victory in November 2016 has been told ad nauseum. He promptly nominated Neil Gorsuch, a much more Conservative jurist than Garland, to fill Scalia’s vacant seat. Hearings were held and Gorsuch was confirmed. The recently concluded SCOTUS term was concluded with his full participation – including several 5-4 decisions which most likely would have been decided differently had Garland been confirmed as would have been the traditional course of action under the circumstances.

Anthony Kennedy, himself confirmed to a seat on the Court in the waning days of the Reagan Administration (February of 1988), decided in late June of 2018 to retire early this month. Mitch McConnell and the GOP Senate leadership, unlike the case almost exactly two years earlier, announced their intention to hold hearings and vote to confirm President Trump’s nominee (Brett Kavanaugh) prior to this year’s midterm elections, which may or may not see a change in which party has a majority in the Senate.

Leaving aside for now the utter hypocrisy involved in setting aside a precedent McConnell had just established himself a year ago and agreeing to fill the seat immediately despite the coming election, rushing to replace Kennedy this quickly seems to many to be a ploy to further radicalize the Court begun by the installation of Gorsuch. Kennedy was no bleeding heart liberal, by any means, but he was often the swing vote in some extremely controversial and groundbreaking decisions rendered by the Court in recent sessions. Kavanaugh, judging by his writings and past court decisions, promises to be further to the right politically than his predecessor, which may serve to produce many decisions in future cases that may reverse decisions which have shaped legislation in recent years on such subjects as abortion, marriage equality, LGBT rights and others.

While further debate in the Courts is to be expected on controversial matters, wholesale reversal on such matters is likely to cause severe disruption on any number of fronts. Reversing Roe v. Wade would have life-altering implications in most, if not all, states, and definitely increased tensions between pro-choice and anti-abortion advocates. Other decisions may re-establish bans on marriage equality or the civil rights of LGBT individuals in many other areas of their lives. The list goes on and on, and many of these concerns will presumably be raised in the course of confirmation hearings, which is the purpose of those hearings.

What is not easy to ignore, however, is the potential of a conflict of interest arising as a result of one and possibly two SCOTUS members having to decide on issues affecting Donald J. Trump’s very Presidency. The strong possibility that the current investigations regarding the Trump campaign and the actions taken by the President and others associated with both his campaign and his Administration to this date could take a course which would lead to a Supreme Court decision which could make or break Donald Trump’s ability to retain his position.

The way in which President Trump went about deciding who he would nominate for such positions is fine. That individuals approved by the extreme right wing groups who provided him with the list from which he selected Gorsuch and Kavanaugh would face stiff opposition from Democrats and various other groups concerned over how future decisions that will drastically affect them is a foregone conclusion and part of the process. Donald Trump’s extreme demands for personal loyalty are not. It would not be unexpected for many people of both parties to expect a Supreme Court Justice to be capable of determining the appropriateness of their participating in a debate and vote on a case where even the hint of a potential conflict of interest may exist.

Donald Trump has amply demonstrated throughout the first year and a half of his Administration a decided inability to show such judgment himself. The circumstances of his firing of Jim Comey as FBI Director and his infuriated response to Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recusal from matters concerning the Special Counsel’s investigation lead many of us to believe that he would also expect anyone he nominated to the Court to under absolutely no circumstances recuse themselves from a case directly dealing with his perceived powers as President of the United States of America. I think most Americans agree that the fact that SCOTUS is a coequal branch of government that he does not supervise and cannot legally fire as he can his cabinet members makes any difference whatsoever to Donald Trump.

On issues such as a sitting President being subject to criminal prosecution, subpoena under oath, or any number of other potential scenarios which may play out in the coming months, it seems on his record to date, Kavanaugh has a predisposition to tend towards the greatest possible leeway in the direction benefitting Trump. He and Gorsuch should both recuse themselves on matters dealing with these issues as they pertain to the President who appointed them.

I happen to disagree strongly with recent Court decisions which may decimate further organized labor in this country, as well as the travel ban that targets individuals from several predominantly Muslim countries. Gorsuch was on the wrong side of both, in my opinion. Kavanaugh did not participate in those decisions. Neither participated in the decisions like Citizens United and the gutting of the Voting Rights Act that many think threaten the future of democracy in this country, but I doubt Trump would’ve nominated them if they openly disputed those decisions. Like most Americans recently polled, I disagree that Roe V. Wade should be reversed. Men forcing medical decisions on women without regard for their input is unacceptable. Using the Court to allow authoritarian evangelical “Christian” morality into law while enforcing social, economic and political inequality, such as the above opinions have done, in my view, was not the intent written into the job description for SCOTUS or any other branch of of our government.

While I firmly believe the US Government and the American people would be far better served by not including Gorsuch and/or Kavanaugh on its Supreme Court, that’s not my call. Nor is it Donald Trump’s. But it certainly is against our interests for those two men to have any part in the proceedings of that body as they may pertain to the President who nominated them. This needs to be made abundantly clear to them, to President Trump and to all our elected Members of Congress. Let there be no doubt that we will not stand for Court appointments that end up saving the job of the corrupt politician who appointed them in the first place by allowing them to cover up their misdeeds.

Suggested Further Readings:

Supreme Court delivers blow to organized labor in fees dispute

Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban

Justice Kennedy retiring; Trump gets 2nd Supreme Court pick

Kennedy’s retirement will have huge consequences for minorities and women

‘The McConnell rule’: Some Dems say the vote for Justice Kennedy’s replacement should be delayed

With Supreme Court’s Capitulation to Hate, Trump’s Stranglehold on Government Tightens

#MidtermsBeforeSCOTUS Takes Off as Democrats Told to ‘Stiffen Their Spines’ –

Siding With Billionaires Against Workers, Supreme Court’s Janus Ruling ‘An Assault on Labor Movement’

With Justice Kennedy Gone, Abortion and Gay Rights Are Next

A Second Trump Term Just Got Way More Likely

American Society Would Collapse If It Weren’t for These 8 Myths

Food for thought from Lee Camp as published in truthdig. Now, as to how we fix this predicament – I really don’t think Donald Trump and Donald Trump alone can solve it. He seems preoccupied with making the status quo increasingly more unequal. – RJC

You cannot comprehend the level of inequality in our current world or even just our nation, but we choose to continue to live like this.

Source: American Society Would Collapse If It Weren’t for These 8 Myths

%d bloggers like this: