Skip to content

The Myth of Just Deserts

September 1, 2013

Attacks on the social safety net, workers’ rights, raising the minimum wage and basically anything aimed at eradicating or ameliorating the enormous economic, political and social inequality in this country tend to rest largely on one tenet – blame the victim. It is possible for anyone to get ahead in this society. If you fail to do so, it is your own fault for either not trying or not working hard enough to succeed. Those who have accumulated wealth deserve to keep it because they have earned it and should not be taxed to make up for the shortcomings of others. People get what they work for and deserve their fate.

Nobody deserves to be rich or poor. No one should starve, or be homeless or without care when they are ill or injured. The above attitude does not take into account many factors which affect the ability of people to succeed here in this day and age. Not everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed economically in this country. Obviously, some are born into family situations more advantageous than others. In way too many respects, money has become the be all and end all of too much of life in this country and world. Money enables parents to get better health care, food, shelter and education for their children than those living in poverty can afford. People are able to advance within our society, but it is far more difficult for most than the defenders of the status quo are willing to admit.

Saying that one needs to apply oneself, work hard, further their education and improve their skills in order to get a better job and earn more money neglects the hard realities faced by many in our nation who grow up in an economy much changed from what it was thirty or 40 years ago. Wages for the vast majority of workers have stagnated with respect to the cost of living. Better paying jobs are harder to find, having been replaced by new technology or outsourced to workers in other countries. Low paying fast-food, retail and other service sector jobs.have replaced more lucrative manufacturing jobs. Labor unions which served to protect workers and help insure their fair treatment in employment have been ravaged by legislation and become far weaker than they were in previous generations.

Telling a single mother working part-time at one or more minimum wage jobs with few or no benefits to improve their education while trying to put food on the table for their kids and pay the rent is not very helpful or practical, especially if you are trying to take away food stamps and other federal benefits that could help to make that possible.The fact is, one of the fastest growing sectors of this economy is in low paying temporary and part-time jobs. Many people are forced to work multiple jobs, each with too few hours to qualify for any benefits. Forget paid time off if you or a family member is sick. Forget health insurance. Forget paid vacation or holidays. They do not exist for these jobs. Do not, as many on the right claim, blame this on Obamacare. This trend began years ago, long before anyone had heard of Barack Obama. It’s now a convenient excuse for employers to use to cut employment costs and deny their workers deserved benefits…

Reducing things like food stamps, head start, housing subsidies, daycare, etc., make it more difficult for those in poverty to improve their situation, as well as affecting the development and education of their children, placing them even further behind their counterparts at the other end of the economic spectrum. The defenders of the status quo like to point out the rare exceptions that make huge fortunes after starting out dirt poor, but they are few and far between. Rather than increase wages and benefits for workers so they can provide more healthy demand for goods and services in a growing economy, they are content to let people languish in poverty so they can own second homes in the Hamptons and avoid taxes in havens in the Caribbean, Switzerland and elsewhere. How does a corporate CEO rate a multimillion dollar compensation package for running a company into the ground and taking away the livelihoods of hundreds or thousands of hard working employees?

The new economy has made gainful employment in living wage occupations far rarer than it was in the past. When I grew up, my family was able to survive well on one income, as were those of most of my friends. That is impossible for most today. Getting a college degree has become more difficult for people from low income families, as costs have increased dramatically while financial aid sources have dwindled, requiring a higher debt burden to be placed on students to obtain that cherished degree. Supposedly, corporations benefit from a more highly educated workforce, but they do everything in their power to avoid paying for one. Job availability upon graduation is far from guaranteed. Going into debt to get an education is not felt by all, however. The well-to-do can pay for their children’s educations easily.

With the level of wealth and income inequality in this country approaching all-time highs, pretending that there is a level playing field for all in this society to excel is a sham. People with the wealth realize this, which is why they fight so hard to make sure that they maintain their wealth and thus increase the probability of a better life for their children. You do not earn a silver spoon, it is given to you in the form of inherited wealth and increased opportunity throughout your early life by the mere fact that your family possesses wealth. Pretending that some deserve to be paid seven or eight digit incomes while others don’t even deserve to be able to subsist and provide for their families while working fulltime insults the intelligence of all thinking people.

The tax code, over the past three decades or so, has increased the ability of the wealthy to keep more of their wealth, as well as their income. “Investment income”, such as capital gains or interest income, are taxed at a lower rate than regular wages. The theory here is that the money will then be used to make improvements to corporations, provide better jobs, and improve the economy for all. In fact, what it becomes is an investment in the future fortunes of the people “earning” it and those of their heirs. Otherwise, how to explain the fact that the rich get richer and the better jobs promised the rest never materialize? Having a minimum wage as an incentive to work harder and improve skills and education doesn’t work very well if those jobs requiring more skills/education and a better paycheck do not exist.

Changing the way income and wealth are taxed and investing the revenues gained to improve real job opportunities, rather than just promising to do so, would be a step in the right direction. Having adequate food, health care, housing and education for all, regardless of income or wealth, should be a human right, not subject to the vagaries of the socio-economic status of one’s parents. Creating a more level playing field for all from the very beginning of life would help eradicate much of this inequality. Redistribution of wealth is not an entirely bad thing, especially considering the way in which much of it has been accumulated and the price paid by the many to provide for the privileges acquired by the lucky few. Making all occupations pay a living wage is essential to improving the prospects for those who currently live in poverty. Taxing and truly investing the wealth accumulated by the 1% and their corporations in ways that will improve the lives of the many and create a more fair and just society is a goal we must achieve before the disparity between the rich and poor becomes unbearable. Surely, the powers that be must realize something must be done to improve the situation. A pressure cooker can only build up so much pressure before it explodes. People do not have an unending tolerance for exploitation and repression.

 

Suggested Further Readings:

The 6 Filthiest Facts about the Rich

Looking for Fraud in All the Wrong Places

Want a Job Where You Can Fail and Still Get Paid Lavishly? Try Corporate CEO

Advertisements

From → Uncategorized

11 Comments
  1. Amen! Thank you for spelling this out so plainly. The Reagan deregulation years and tax cuts have destroyed the economy for several generations. That’s why we have a glut of homelessness since he closed/eased mental health facilitates, drug commercials which used to be banned and the next thing you know 5 years later that drug is up for lawsuit. Higher education is free and/or mandatory in many first world countries.Secondary education usually involves skilled labor, where in this country, high school diploma’s qualify most students for anything. I hope people read and get ready to reinvest in our country, so it can be great again.

    Like

  2. Reblogged this on Tess Powell Out Loud and commented:
    The truth about income inequality and we we should all care.

    Like

  3. alison permalink

    I’m not trolling or diminishing your argument in anyway with this, I agree wholeheartedly, but I think you may have meant “just desserts”. It’s a common mistake and most likely just a typo but I thought maybe you might have missed it and I don’t want anyone to use it against you. Feel free to delete this comment after you correct if you like.

    Like

    • Lynwellyn permalink

      Got those just deserts. Huh. This is trolling but I couldn’t help it. It was just to delicious to resist. Lol.

      Like

  4. I would like to direct those who kindly pointed out the difference between desert and dessert to the following link: http://grammarist.com/spelling/just-deserts-just-desserts/ Thank you all for your comments 🙂

    Like

  5. Debbie permalink

    Income inequality is very real in our country. The same opportunities are not available for all people and your blog addresses that beautifully and what needs to be done.

    Like

  6. I agree with you. I just spent Tuesday as an election judge in a “conservative” district and listened to hours of grumbling about the expense of early voting . . . yet this same group has no problem with companies gutting workers’ rights, benefits, living wage so that a questionable few can reap a windfall of profits . . . the former being for the benefit of democracy (a presumably pro-social goal) and the later being for the benefit of who? It’s so very confusing. Nice piece. Well said.

    Like

  7. Reblogged this on BigMinds Media and commented:
    I’m of the opinion that good government is not about blaming the indebted or the poor or the “lazy”, but about assuming corporate responsibility, restituting the wronged, repairing the cracks and moving on.

    The blaming of the poor or indebted is stupid and doesn’t get us anywhere.

    Like

  8. Palmer Scott permalink

    I enjoy your writing, but please change Deserts to Desserts.

    Like

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. The Myth of Just Desserts | Translation Scrapbook
  2. Pressenza - The myth of Just Deserts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: